AMA Wants ICD-10 Deferred by Two Years, Texas Docs Want ICD-10 Junked

Nope, make it a two-year delay "at a minimum"—so urged the American Medical Association (AMA) the federal government on its plan to move the compliance date of ICD-10 by one year, to Oct. 1, 2013.

The urging came hot on the heels of the statement of the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME) in a letter sent to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) secretary Kathleen Sebelius, saying HHS’s proposed one-year deferment of the ICD-10 compliance date was the perfect “middle ground.” The transition to the new coding system of ICD-10 impacts medical facilities and practices, even providers of medical coding online training and medical coding online courses, in a number of ways. One of them is the potential for healthcare delivery to be considerably improved, but there are many doubters.

"A two-year delay of the compliance deadline for ICD-10 is a necessary first step," AMA officials said in a May 10 letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) acting administrator, Marilyn B. Tavenner. Significantly, AMA proposed in its letter that CMS put into play a process involving all stakeholders (including doctors, regulators, healthcare information technology professionals, medical coders, and administrators) to arrive at an alternative code set that is more appropriate and easier to implement than ICD-10. If no alternative is found, AMA wants ICD-10 postponed indefinitely.

AMA contended that doctors will fail to cope with the comprehensive financial and administrative burdens of a transition to ICD-10 even as they contend with “a number of inadequately aligned” federal programs and a proposed 31-percent Medicare reimbursement cut tentatively set for Jan. 1, 2013.

The Texas Medical Association, meanwhile, has joined AMA in calling on the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius for an alternative to ICD-10—or for its scrapping altogether. Its contention is based on its central fear that the new diagnostic code set "will introduce great cost ... without a corresponding benefit."

The Texas group, for instance, has proposed that HHS either hold off until ICD-11 is ready (under development and will not be completed till 2015) or adopt a ready alternative, such as the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms, or Snomed CT, clinical coding system.

Like AMA, the group requested the HHS to push the compliance deadline by "a period of greater than one year" if it is to implement ICD-10 at all.

"The United States did not adopt the ICD-10 coding system 20 years ago when the standard was state-of-the-art," pointed out Dr. C. Bruce Malone, the Texas Medical Association president. "Now, it's nearing obsolescence."

Malone also said, HHS "should recognize that the costs of going to ICD-11 directly are less than incurring the remaining costs of implementing ICD-10 in 2014 and then implementing ICD-11 sometime soon thereafter."

Meditec.com, like other providers of online medical coding training—as well as medical transcription training and medical office assistant training—provides the medical coding community the training it needs to transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10.